Final Summary / Reader Response Draft of Deep Trekker DTG3 ROV
Deep Trekker's DTG3 ROVs might easily rank as one of the most effective ROVs for usage in inspecting underwater coastal marine life with all these characteristics and capabilities. Although its expense is a drawback, this is supported by its sophisticated camera system and ROV body's stability and flexibility.
One of the most crucial designs for the ROV's camera system is one that allows the user to record or analyse underwater coastal marine life. According to the Deep Trekker’s website (2022), the DTG3 comes with a full high-definition (HD) camera, which is a choice of upgrade to a camera with a resolution of four times of a full HD camera, also known as 4 Kilo(K) or thousand. Its manufacturing company also stated that it has a camera rotation limit of 270 degrees, which ability to observe most of the tightest angles while maintaining a clear image or video (ROV Buying Guide | Everything You Need to Know Before You Buy, 2022). The DTG3 also has BRIDGE technology, which uses an algorithm for image stability and clarity under various real-world circumstances (Powered by BRIDGE Technology, 2022). All of this might be corroborated by an experiment done by Khorgane (2021) on the research of coastal bivalves, which demonstrates Deep Trekker is superior at capturing the view since the camera of the Chasing Dory TX, a different yet similar class ROV, had poor video quality. A more effective camera system will also increase the ROV's effectiveness, which represents the effectiveness of the DTG3 in examining aquatic coastal species.
Even though the ROV should have more sophisticated features to be able to check marine life, its body weight complicates underwater manoeuvrability and stability. Anwar et al. (2016) state that when a vehicle approaches the density of the water, its weight will have an impact on its density. This relationship can be seen in the graph of a ROV with water pump chambers pumps in water to raise its weight (Anwar et al., 2016). As density is directly proportional to weight, a higher weight will result in a higher density of ROVs, which will cause a sinking effect, reducing their mobility and flexibility as more force is needed to manoeuvre the ROV (Yadav, 2022). The ROV's stability may also be impacted by weight. The buoyancy line must be parallel to the weight of the ROV's body (Buoyancy & Stability, 2016). To do it, the ROV needs neutral buoyancy by density according to Sahili et al. (2018), which should be equivalent to the water's density of about one thousand kilograms per cubic meter. Considering all of that, the ROV's density is crucial and is determined by the density of the ROV's weight and material, in this instance acrylic, one of the least dense yet stable materials (Physical Properties of Acrylic, n.d.). The DTG3 is ideal for retaining stability and flexibility underwater when examining coastal marine life because of the low weighted density of the acrylic material, which makes it efficient.
However, DTG3 is more expensive than its rivals, so customers will need to reconsider purchasing one. For example, the Chasing Dory is cheaper than the DTG3, with each costing USD $649 and $8500, respectively (ROV Buying Guide | Everything You Need to Know Before You Buy, 2022) (CHASING DORY UNDERWATER DRONE | The most affordable and portable underwater drone, n.d.). Users must consider this significant pricing disparity given that both allow users to view underwater aquatic life. Even so, people will incline to adopt DTG3 because of its superior specs. Khorgane (2021) claims that the DTG3 was used for his research on employing a ROV to check coastal bivalves since it had a longer cable, a stronger engine, and higher video quality than the Chasing Dory ROV.
In summary, despite being the most expensive ROV on the market, the Deep Trekker's DTG3 is still the most effective for examining marine life along the coast because of its outstanding camera system, stability, and flexibility brought on by its density.
Buoyancy & Stability. (2016, January 27). Retrieved from
https://www.iitg.ac.in/kartha/CE203FM/Lectures/Week3/Lecture_9%20Buoyancy%20and%20Stability.pdf
CHASING DORY UNDERWATER DRONE | The most affordable and
portable underwater drone. (n.d.). Retrieved from Chasing:
https://www.chasing.com/chasing-dory.html
DTG3 Package. (2022). Retrieved
from Deep Trekker: https://www.deeptrekker.com/shop/products/dtg3
DTG3 ROV. (2022). Retrieved from Deep
Trekker: https://www.deeptrekker.com/products/underwater-rov/dtg3-b
Inzamam Anwar, M. Owais Mohsin, Saqib Iqbal, Zain Ul Abideen,
Attique Ur Rehman, Nisar Ahmed. (2016). Design and fabrication of an underwater
remotely operated vehicle (Single thruster configuration). 2016 13th
International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST).
Islamabad, Pakistan: IEEE. Retrieved from
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7429932
Jihad Sahili, Ali El-Hadi Hamoud, Ahmad Jammoul. (2018). ROV
Design Optimization: Effect on Stability and Drag force. 6th RSI
International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (IcRoM 2018). Tehran,
Iran: IEEE.
Khoygane, S. E. (2021). Methods for studying coastal
bivalves in a changing world: A review and implications for management.
University of Agder. Retrieved from https://uia.brage.unit.no/uia-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2778939/Khoygane%20Sevan%20Esagholian.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Physical Properties of Acrylic.
(n.d.). Retrieved from Chi Hwa Advertising:
https://www.chi-hwa.com.tw/en/profession/acrylic
Powered by BRIDGE Technology.
(2022). Retrieved from Deep Trekker:
https://www.deeptrekker.com/company/bridge-technology
ROV Buying Guide | Everything You Need to Know Before You Buy. (2022). Retrieved from Deep Trekker:
https://www.deeptrekker.com/resources/rov-buying-guide
Yadav, P. (2022, September 24). Difference Between Density
and Weight. Retrieved from AskAnyDifference.com:
https://askanydifference.com/difference-between-density-and-weight/
Comments
Post a Comment